Scoring breakdown
GPUs weights turn category-specific evidence into the score.
Comfortable for local experimentation, but longer contexts and larger models still hit the ceiling.
Weighted impact: 3.12/10Good enough for repeated dev loops, not a replacement for high-utilization hosted capacity.
Weighted impact: 1.70/10Stable when treated as a workstation workload with sane cooling and driver discipline.
Weighted impact: 1.74/10The value is strongest when it is used every week for private iteration and evals.
Weighted impact: 2.27/10Buy when privacy, iteration speed, and repeated local experiments matter every week.
Skip if you mainly need production concurrency, burst capacity, or models above the card's memory ceiling.
Wait if your expected utilization is unclear or a new memory tier is within budget soon.
Measured fit
- VRAM
- 24GB class
- Power profile
- Workstation
- Best workload
- Local inference iteration
- Scaling limit
- Concurrent users
- VRAM headroom
- Good
- Noise
- Manageable
- Production fit
- Limited
Evidence and caveats
- Private eval loops were smoother than hosted queues for small and mid-size models.
- VRAM, not raw compute, became the deciding limit during longer-context tests.
- Power and cooling planning changed the value equation more than benchmark deltas.